<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Christian Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christianradio.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Discussion about the Christian radio industry.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Poll results by tournament blackjack online</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2005/04/10/poll-results/#comment-4603</link>
		<dc:creator>tournament blackjack online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 03:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2005/04/10/poll-results/#comment-4603</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;tournament blackjack online...&lt;/strong&gt;

Maine nicknamed plaintiveness:wolves.unalienable seizures ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>tournament blackjack online&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Maine nicknamed plaintiveness:wolves.unalienable seizures &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economy hurting non-com funding by 91.3fm KDKR</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/economy-hurting-non-com-funding/#comment-4593</link>
		<dc:creator>91.3fm KDKR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-4593</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the post. Non-Com radio is the best! and our listeners are super faithful. I like the idea of sending return envelopes to our donors as a way to make it easier on them to give, and even save them the cost of postage.

thanks for the blog. 
may I add you to my "blog roll"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the post. Non-Com radio is the best! and our listeners are super faithful. I like the idea of sending return envelopes to our donors as a way to make it easier on them to give, and even save them the cost of postage.</p>
<p>thanks for the blog.<br />
may I add you to my &#8220;blog roll&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life after Tommy and Brook by christianradio</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/life-after-tommy-and-brook/#comment-4584</link>
		<dc:creator>christianradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=217#comment-4584</guid>
		<description>No, I haven't made judgments about motives. I've simply asked the question -- do WE put too much emphasis on personalities?  I believe in my earlier posts I said that I didn't have an answer to this question because you need quality announcers and you need Christ in your programming.  The question (in my mind) is balance.  I wasn't coming out and judging ANYONE'S motives (specifically), although I DO want people to think about how they 'DO' radio because it's easy to fall on one side of the fence or the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I haven&#8217;t made judgments about motives. I&#8217;ve simply asked the question &#8212; do WE put too much emphasis on personalities?  I believe in my earlier posts I said that I didn&#8217;t have an answer to this question because you need quality announcers and you need Christ in your programming.  The question (in my mind) is balance.  I wasn&#8217;t coming out and judging ANYONE&#8217;S motives (specifically), although I DO want people to think about how they &#8216;DO&#8217; radio because it&#8217;s easy to fall on one side of the fence or the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life after Tommy and Brook by Donnie</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/life-after-tommy-and-brook/#comment-4583</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 18:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=217#comment-4583</guid>
		<description>Let me clarify, then I won't bother you again.  What I'm saying first of all is that it does not seem to be the Spirit of Christ to mention names in the context of slamming an "issue" or "philosophy" prevalent today, whether that be in the church or in Christian radio.  As soon as you link somebody's name to the "issue" of "personality-driven Christian radio," it doesn't take a rocket surgeon (thank you, President Bush, for that one!) to figure out that you're saying those people whose names you've mentioned are guilty of the whole "personality-driven" thing...the response from a guy named Jeff (I think) to your first blog only confirms what I'm saying.  And I'm saying that it shouldn't be happening in a public forum.  You shouldn't have brought it up in December, and you shouldn't be bringing it up with naming names today, either.

Second, my point about Matthew 7:1 was not meant to be applied to anyone's motive for leaving one radio station and going to another.  I know you've walked carefully on that one, and I commend you.  What I'm talking about is judging others' motives concerning how they "do" radio...their methodologies, etc.  You've made judgments about people being too personality driven, and have suggested or at least intimated publicly that certain individuals were too self-centered, making it about them, rather than Christ, by the way they did their jobs.  You may not care for what actually goes out over the air, but I don't think it's fair to assume you know their motives.  And that's kind of how it came out.

And that's too bad.  Jesus said, "If they're not against me, they're for me."  You may not like their methods, but to suggest or intimate that they are not interested in having "Christ in Christian radio" is itself unchristian in my mind.  Again, it doesn't strike me as having the Spirit of Christ.  I wish you would just let the issue drop.  They did a good job when they were at "our" radio station, and they're doing a good job at the station they're at now.  Let's just leave it at that and move on, OK?

And I agree with your last paragraph, just to show that I'm not disagreeable about everything!  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me clarify, then I won&#8217;t bother you again.  What I&#8217;m saying first of all is that it does not seem to be the Spirit of Christ to mention names in the context of slamming an &#8220;issue&#8221; or &#8220;philosophy&#8221; prevalent today, whether that be in the church or in Christian radio.  As soon as you link somebody&#8217;s name to the &#8220;issue&#8221; of &#8220;personality-driven Christian radio,&#8221; it doesn&#8217;t take a rocket surgeon (thank you, President Bush, for that one!) to figure out that you&#8217;re saying those people whose names you&#8217;ve mentioned are guilty of the whole &#8220;personality-driven&#8221; thing&#8230;the response from a guy named Jeff (I think) to your first blog only confirms what I&#8217;m saying.  And I&#8217;m saying that it shouldn&#8217;t be happening in a public forum.  You shouldn&#8217;t have brought it up in December, and you shouldn&#8217;t be bringing it up with naming names today, either.</p>
<p>Second, my point about Matthew 7:1 was not meant to be applied to anyone&#8217;s motive for leaving one radio station and going to another.  I know you&#8217;ve walked carefully on that one, and I commend you.  What I&#8217;m talking about is judging others&#8217; motives concerning how they &#8220;do&#8221; radio&#8230;their methodologies, etc.  You&#8217;ve made judgments about people being too personality driven, and have suggested or at least intimated publicly that certain individuals were too self-centered, making it about them, rather than Christ, by the way they did their jobs.  You may not care for what actually goes out over the air, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair to assume you know their motives.  And that&#8217;s kind of how it came out.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s too bad.  Jesus said, &#8220;If they&#8217;re not against me, they&#8217;re for me.&#8221;  You may not like their methods, but to suggest or intimate that they are not interested in having &#8220;Christ in Christian radio&#8221; is itself unchristian in my mind.  Again, it doesn&#8217;t strike me as having the Spirit of Christ.  I wish you would just let the issue drop.  They did a good job when they were at &#8220;our&#8221; radio station, and they&#8217;re doing a good job at the station they&#8217;re at now.  Let&#8217;s just leave it at that and move on, OK?</p>
<p>And I agree with your last paragraph, just to show that I&#8217;m not disagreeable about everything! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life after Tommy and Brook by christianradio</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/life-after-tommy-and-brook/#comment-4582</link>
		<dc:creator>christianradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 03:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=217#comment-4582</guid>
		<description>Donnie:

I don’t believe I was ‘bashing’ anyone. I mentioned their names only because I blogged about it months ago and want to give some reference. In terms of ‘issue’ — I stuck with the issue. “Do Christian radio stations put too much emphasis on personalities?”

In terms of Matthew 7:1 — I don’t believe I condemned anyone here. I didn’t suggest the two left for any other reason than they ‘were called’ to go - which is what they told me in an email. I believe I wrote that in a previous blog. I just remember there were many who thought their departure would hurt WCSG. While it hurt internally, I didn’t think WCSG would see fewer people listening because of it. The only tool I have to prove that point is Arbitron. If I had another source, I would use that. I said in a previous blog that I would look at the next book to see if my theory was correct. That’s what I did.

I’ve NEVER said numbers don't mean anything. What I DID say is numbers shouldn’t DRIVE what we do in Christian radio. The message of the Gospel is offensive. That will push people away. There are a few things in Christian radio that are measurable — Arbitron, Sharathon, website visits and how the station is motivating people to be involved in outreach. The last one isn’t always visible…but you can see it if you start looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donnie:</p>
<p>I don’t believe I was ‘bashing’ anyone. I mentioned their names only because I blogged about it months ago and want to give some reference. In terms of ‘issue’ — I stuck with the issue. “Do Christian radio stations put too much emphasis on personalities?”</p>
<p>In terms of Matthew 7:1 — I don’t believe I condemned anyone here. I didn’t suggest the two left for any other reason than they ‘were called’ to go - which is what they told me in an email. I believe I wrote that in a previous blog. I just remember there were many who thought their departure would hurt WCSG. While it hurt internally, I didn’t think WCSG would see fewer people listening because of it. The only tool I have to prove that point is Arbitron. If I had another source, I would use that. I said in a previous blog that I would look at the next book to see if my theory was correct. That’s what I did.</p>
<p>I’ve NEVER said numbers don&#8217;t mean anything. What I DID say is numbers shouldn’t DRIVE what we do in Christian radio. The message of the Gospel is offensive. That will push people away. There are a few things in Christian radio that are measurable — Arbitron, Sharathon, website visits and how the station is motivating people to be involved in outreach. The last one isn’t always visible…but you can see it if you start looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Life after Tommy and Brook by Donnie</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/05/27/life-after-tommy-and-brook/#comment-4580</link>
		<dc:creator>Donnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=217#comment-4580</guid>
		<description>Pardon my objection, but it just does not seem becoming to engage in this kind of public bashing of other people.  You may say that you're just talking about the "issue," but as soon as you mention someone's name in connection with it, you're now talking about them as well.  Whatever you may think of people and their motives and/or methods, you really have to be careful that you're not crossing the line of Matt. 7:1.  Oh and one more thing...you live by the sword, you die by the sword, Greg.  You say numbers don't really mean anything, so why quote them when they're in your favor?  Will you really think that your theory has been blown to bits if WCSG's spring numbers go down, and Star's go up?  Will you watch the trend over several books, or will you go back to the old mantra, "numbers don't matter."  I don't think they matter so much either, but I'm not going to gloat just because they might be in my favor...this time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon my objection, but it just does not seem becoming to engage in this kind of public bashing of other people.  You may say that you&#8217;re just talking about the &#8220;issue,&#8221; but as soon as you mention someone&#8217;s name in connection with it, you&#8217;re now talking about them as well.  Whatever you may think of people and their motives and/or methods, you really have to be careful that you&#8217;re not crossing the line of Matt. 7:1.  Oh and one more thing&#8230;you live by the sword, you die by the sword, Greg.  You say numbers don&#8217;t really mean anything, so why quote them when they&#8217;re in your favor?  Will you really think that your theory has been blown to bits if WCSG&#8217;s spring numbers go down, and Star&#8217;s go up?  Will you watch the trend over several books, or will you go back to the old mantra, &#8220;numbers don&#8217;t matter.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think they matter so much either, but I&#8217;m not going to gloat just because they might be in my favor&#8230;this time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on To NRB and on a mission by Stacy Harp</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/to-nrb-and-on-a-mission/#comment-4558</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacy Harp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=209#comment-4558</guid>
		<description>Hey Greg,

I totally understand what you're saying!  I wish I could have gone, but I won't be able to for another few years until it comes back to California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Greg,</p>
<p>I totally understand what you&#8217;re saying!  I wish I could have gone, but I won&#8217;t be able to for another few years until it comes back to California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tommy and Brook continues by christianradio</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/tommy-and-brook-continues/#comment-4545</link>
		<dc:creator>christianradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=207#comment-4545</guid>
		<description>WhatDoesItAllMean:

I appreciate you comments. Yes, I've listened a half hour here and a half hour there. Those are my listening habits on those types of radio stations.  I listen the same way to most Christian radio stations. I'm a big talk-radio fan. While entertaining, for me it's compelling.  That's just my preference. It doesn't make it right or wrong -- it's just my preference. 

Perhaps Clear Channel 'got this one right' and that's great. I'm glad we have one more radio station in the market that's 'family friendly.' That's what many, many radio stations are striving for. In terms of speaking from the heart with conviction -- great! I'm glad they're doing that, too. I'm happy for them -- I really am.  

My point of this blog has never been to criticize individuals, it's been to highlight issues in 'Christian' radio and provide a platform for Christian radio professionals to discuss Christian radio issues -- especially non-commercial Christian Radio. Christians radio has gone through some serious changes in the last 20 years. We've gone from just a few formats to many formats. We've gone from a philosophy of just talking about Christ to reach non-believers that happen to be listening, to talking about Christ little to attract non-believers to listen to their stations.

I'm not saying one way is right or wrong -- but, what I am saying is you can't take Christ out of Christian radio. If you do that, you're losing Christian radio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WhatDoesItAllMean:</p>
<p>I appreciate you comments. Yes, I&#8217;ve listened a half hour here and a half hour there. Those are my listening habits on those types of radio stations.  I listen the same way to most Christian radio stations. I&#8217;m a big talk-radio fan. While entertaining, for me it&#8217;s compelling.  That&#8217;s just my preference. It doesn&#8217;t make it right or wrong &#8212; it&#8217;s just my preference. </p>
<p>Perhaps Clear Channel &#8216;got this one right&#8217; and that&#8217;s great. I&#8217;m glad we have one more radio station in the market that&#8217;s &#8216;family friendly.&#8217; That&#8217;s what many, many radio stations are striving for. In terms of speaking from the heart with conviction &#8212; great! I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re doing that, too. I&#8217;m happy for them &#8212; I really am.  </p>
<p>My point of this blog has never been to criticize individuals, it&#8217;s been to highlight issues in &#8216;Christian&#8217; radio and provide a platform for Christian radio professionals to discuss Christian radio issues &#8212; especially non-commercial Christian Radio. Christians radio has gone through some serious changes in the last 20 years. We&#8217;ve gone from just a few formats to many formats. We&#8217;ve gone from a philosophy of just talking about Christ to reach non-believers that happen to be listening, to talking about Christ little to attract non-believers to listen to their stations.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying one way is right or wrong &#8212; but, what I am saying is you can&#8217;t take Christ out of Christian radio. If you do that, you&#8217;re losing Christian radio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tommy and Brook continues by whatdoesitallmean</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/tommy-and-brook-continues/#comment-4544</link>
		<dc:creator>whatdoesitallmean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 18:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=207#comment-4544</guid>
		<description>Have you spent time listening to Tommy and Brook on 105.7? They seem to really be walking the line very well...they are compassionate, aren't afraid to speak from the heart with conviction, and they are conneting with people like I have never heard. It's hilarous, too, to hear Denis and Nannette using phrases like "we should PRAY for Britney Spears" and trying to emulate Tommy and Brook. It's obvious that Clear Channel got this one right. Sure, it's too bad for the WCSG audience. But why can't anyone realize that Tommy and Brook are really...REALLY good at what they do? They could do WHAT they are doing anywhere in the country...but CHOSE to stay in West Michigan and share their energy and conviction on a 265,000 watt signal. I can't tell, but it seems like they have a solid focus and direction, their message is matched perfectly with the radio station, and I think it sounds really, really refreshing on commercial radio. Besides, its not like they're going to give up or say they "made a mistake". With all of the "trashing" that's gone on, its kinda sad to think that people (even the ones "inside" on this board) can't be happy for them, for their families, and for the LISTENERS that can be impacted by what they do everyday. This shouldn't be about any of us, but about the people the consume the message.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you spent time listening to Tommy and Brook on 105.7? They seem to really be walking the line very well&#8230;they are compassionate, aren&#8217;t afraid to speak from the heart with conviction, and they are conneting with people like I have never heard. It&#8217;s hilarous, too, to hear Denis and Nannette using phrases like &#8220;we should PRAY for Britney Spears&#8221; and trying to emulate Tommy and Brook. It&#8217;s obvious that Clear Channel got this one right. Sure, it&#8217;s too bad for the WCSG audience. But why can&#8217;t anyone realize that Tommy and Brook are really&#8230;REALLY good at what they do? They could do WHAT they are doing anywhere in the country&#8230;but CHOSE to stay in West Michigan and share their energy and conviction on a 265,000 watt signal. I can&#8217;t tell, but it seems like they have a solid focus and direction, their message is matched perfectly with the radio station, and I think it sounds really, really refreshing on commercial radio. Besides, its not like they&#8217;re going to give up or say they &#8220;made a mistake&#8221;. With all of the &#8220;trashing&#8221; that&#8217;s gone on, its kinda sad to think that people (even the ones &#8220;inside&#8221; on this board) can&#8217;t be happy for them, for their families, and for the LISTENERS that can be impacted by what they do everyday. This shouldn&#8217;t be about any of us, but about the people the consume the message.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tommy and Brook continues by christianradio</title>
		<link>http://christianradio.wordpress.com/2008/02/04/tommy-and-brook-continues/#comment-4543</link>
		<dc:creator>christianradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 15:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christianradio.wordpress.com/?p=207#comment-4543</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I've changed at all.  I don't believe I ever condemned Tommy and Brook for leaving WCSG and going to another station (If I have, I'm sorry). I believe I was wondering if Christian radio puts too much emphasis on personalities -- and not enough on Christ. I also think I criticized them in the way they left, not for the reason they left. Who am I to say whether they were called to go to a secular radio station -- perhaps they'll be able to have an impact on the people at the station.  I don't think they'll be able to do much evangelism on the air -- they can show love, compassion and how to make a generic difference in someone's life -- which is all good -- but, God's WORD is what transforms lives. Again, if this opens doors for them to share their faith AWESOME.  If it doesn't -- that's okay, too -- cuz they're able to share Christ where they work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;ve changed at all.  I don&#8217;t believe I ever condemned Tommy and Brook for leaving WCSG and going to another station (If I have, I&#8217;m sorry). I believe I was wondering if Christian radio puts too much emphasis on personalities &#8212; and not enough on Christ. I also think I criticized them in the way they left, not for the reason they left. Who am I to say whether they were called to go to a secular radio station &#8212; perhaps they&#8217;ll be able to have an impact on the people at the station.  I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll be able to do much evangelism on the air &#8212; they can show love, compassion and how to make a generic difference in someone&#8217;s life &#8212; which is all good &#8212; but, God&#8217;s WORD is what transforms lives. Again, if this opens doors for them to share their faith AWESOME.  If it doesn&#8217;t &#8212; that&#8217;s okay, too &#8212; cuz they&#8217;re able to share Christ where they work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
